FORKNI-L
Logfile LOG9604B Part 9
April 9, 1996
File: "FORKNI-L LOG9604B" Part 9
TOPICS:
Uncle`s 3rd Season L
Prince Nick (was Re: Is Nick a snob?) (8)
BB Questions
it can now be revealed
First FK CD and now......!
Every 54 years (7)
Strangulation in SOB
What's on?
FK copyrights?
BB Questions
YKYB... Lit. Edition
FK CD-What CD?
YKYB...
<no subject> (2)
Rosebud (2)
Audiobooks-need information
Janette and LaCroix
umm
Liking Third Season
Vampiric Balance (2)
FK CD info
mysterious legends beyond
Blood/Blood Light Recipes
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 13:13:03 +0200
From: Marina Bailey <tmar@o.......>
Subject: Re: Uncle`s 3rd Season L
Idalia Kakesako wrote:
>Uncle has been looking great this season also.
Np> But Marina, aren't you forgetting his industrial strength, fuzzy
Np> caterpillar eyebrows? <eg>
I hadn't noticed. When exactly do they start popping up (if you'll excuse
the pun)? I've seen up to "Avenging Angel".
- Marina.
\\ "And tell me if you want to catch that feeling of redemption; //
// That feeling of redemption don't do much for me." - Tanita Tikaram \\
\\======Marina Bailey========tmar@f.......=======Dark Knightie======//
... Janeway doesn't need to straighten her uniform all the time.
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 07:14:43 -0400
From: Dotti Rhodes <dottir@w.......>
Subject: Re: Prince Nick (was Re: Is Nick a snob?)
>While she didn't seem to mind the initial rather "spirited" :) attentions
>of Nick or even being thrown down on the couch, she looked to me like
>she *did not* like being strangled.
>
Yep, this time I'd have to agree with Susan, she did look to me like she ws
getting a bit annoyed there....
Dotti R
Knightie 4-Ever
dottir@w.......
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 07:38:47 -0400
From: Carrie Krumtum <Carrie400@a.......>
Subject: Re: Prince Nick (was Re: Is Nick a snob?)
In a message dated 96-04-09 06:46:12 EDT, Dotti writes:
> Sometimes
>I think it's just coz he's LaCroix's son that no one sneaks up on him and
>stakes him anyway!!
Okay, I just got to talk about this one.
Have we all forgotten about Nick's quite adequate ability to intimidate? What
about his take down of the Inca? He got the Inca to tell him the whole story.
What about the way he managed to intimidate Vachon AND Screed (and he didn't
even lay on hand on Screed). What about Danny the vamp in the video
department in Unreality TV? Spark? His willingness to face off with LaCroix
in Father's Day? What about Nick yelling at a whole bunker full of vamps
"Wake up, all of you! Who did it!" in CRCH?
It is my humble opinion that our boy has earned a measure of respect in 'the
community' for just being Nick. A vamp who don't wanna be a vamp no more, but
is perfectly capable of using his 800 yrs of experience (and the power that
comes with it) when it is necessary. Let us not forget the Vietnam vamp in
CRCH who tells Nick, "They warned me about you. Some said you might stay out
of it." (He didn't of course)
I could give more examples, but, I think I've made my point. Nick can be one
nasty hombre to deal with when he needs to be. Besides, who's to say that his
constancy in his attempts to be rid of his curse hasn't earned him some
grudging respect? Surely he's not the only vamp who has had second thoughts
about the whole vamp thing? Remember LaCroix? "And we are truly eternal?"
Divia "Yes, father." LC "You were right Divia. And damn you for it."
Carrie,
Proud Knightie who simply refuses to duck OR run...
Carrie400@a.......
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 08:12:26 -0400
From: Dotti Rhodes <dottir@w.......>
Subject: Re: Prince Nick (was Re: Is Nick a snob?)
At 07:38 AM 4/9/96 -0400, Carrie wrote:
> Nick can be one nasty hombre to deal with when he needs to be. Besides,
>who's to say that his constancy in his attempts to be rid of his curse
>hasn't earned him some
>grudging respect? Surely he's not the only vamp who has had second thoughts
>about the whole vamp thing?
Ah, dear Carrie - mea culpa, mea culpa. I had forgotten Nick can be pretty
scary when he wants to be. Sorry--I really love it when he does that too.
Dotti R
Knightie 4-Ever
dottir@w.......
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 08:55:28 -0400
From: Tammy Stephanie Davis <tsd@u.......>
Subject: Re: Prince Nick (was Re: Is Nick a snob?)
On Mon, 8 Apr 1996, Elizabeth Ann Lewis wrote:
> At 8:52 PM 4/08/96, Cynthia Hoffman wrote:
> >On Mon, 8 Apr 1996, ELIZABETH ANN LEWIS wrote:
> >> Regarding the girl in the back room in SoB and why LC would have told her
> >> to shut up:
> >> I suppose this isn't the time to mention my theory that she was *mortal*
> >I'll bite: if she was mortal why did she have fangs and gold eyes?
>
> Because Nick was hallucinating, like he was when bottles of blood flew all
> over the loft and gook started coming up out of the sink (Liquid Plummer,
> Nick?)
>
> Although I'll buy Sandra's explanation that she was a younger vampire and
> could be injured by his greater strength. But I like mine better--why
> would LaCroix be happy that he was sucking face with another female vamp?
Naw, I don't buy the hallucinating angle for one specific reason - Nick
was *strangling* that woman for a substantial period of time. If she
were mortal, she would at the very least had passed out. But when
Nick let her go, she wasn't hurt (annoyed, but uninjured.)
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 09:03:20 -0400
From: Matthew F Funke <mff@h.......>
Subject: Re: BB Questions
> Should the explosion have killed Vachon? Not unless it incinerated him, and
> there were a lot of bodies that weren't incinerated (they could identify
> everybody). Plus, a mortal baby survived it too, with nary a scratch.
Thanks. That's what I meant. True, an explosion DID occur, but
that didn't mean that the whole plane had to become a huge fireball.
-- Lost in the Shadows,
Dr Funke (mff@h.......)
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 08:10:30 +0200
From: Katrinka <STUKENDALCA@m.......>
Subject: it can now be revealed
yes it's true, Pat Elrod is writing a new book. Called "Keeper Of The
King" it's about the last defender of Camelot must begin anew his quest
for the holy Grail. Why am I writing about this on a fk list? Well, it's
because of her co-writer. It's official, so I am allowed to tell. It's
Nigel Bennett. Yep, *that* Nigel Bennett. Her latest newsletter has some
very nice pics of her and him hard a work. He looks very ununcle like.
Especally since one pic is taken in the sunlight. The book is coming out
in October 1996. Theres a full report in pat's clubs latest newsletter.
katrinka
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 09:13:08 -0400
From: Katja Stokley <cstokley@c.......>
Subject: Re: Prince Nick (was Re: Is Nick a snob?)
On Mon, 8 Apr 1996, Elizabeth Ann Lewis wrote:
> Because Nick was hallucinating, like he was when bottles of blood flew all
> over the loft and gook started coming up out of the sink (Liquid Plummer,
> Nick?)
No, no, no, no...that was *real* gook coming out of the sink and bottles
of blood *really* flying around - it's the telekinetic demon! Just my
humble opinion.
Katja Stokley -*- cstokley@g.......
-*- Enter any 12 digit prime number to continue -*-
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 08:34:27 -0500
From: tim jones <tl@i.......>
Subject: First FK CD and now......!
Hi all! (waving at ya!)
GAWD!!! First the FK CD is en route,(waiting impatiently,btw)
And now hearing that NB has co-written a book.!!! Colour this Cousin,
extremely happy!!
Cousin Kelly, aspring member thong throng!
Desperatly seeking my own Computer/E-mail address!!!!
http://members.aol.com/CuznJamiMR/SaveForeverKnight.html
tl@i.......
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 09:36:02 EDT
From: Lisa McDavid <D020214@u.......>
Subject: Every 54 years
Someone extrapolated that, based on that once every ten minutes heart
beat, female vampires would only menstruate every 54 years.
Am I the only one who immediately had an horrific vision of Janette
with PMS?
Cousin Lisa -- "That will be trouble."
Lisa McDavid
mcdavid-lisa@s.......
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 09:48:46 EDT
From: Tanya Smith <bodybldr@v.......>
Subject: Strangulation in SOB
She wasn't mortal. BTW, strangulation is often used for the very kinky
to intensify an orgasm. Suppose Nick could be heightening her orgasm?
Just wondering
*Blush*
Dark Nightie and Enraptured cousin
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 07:18:56 -0700
From: Madwand <madwand@e.......>
Subject: Re: Every 54 years
McDavid" at Apr 9, 96 09:36:02 am
>
> Someone extrapolated that, based on that once every ten minutes heart
> beat, female vampires would only menstruate every 54 years.
>
> Am I the only one who immediately had an horrific vision of Janette
> with PMS?
>
And the scary part is, if only only happens every 54 years, just how long
does it last?
|------------------------------------------------------------|
|Aaron Smith | Wizards Guild Parking... |
|madwand@e....... | Violators will be toad! |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
| REALITY.SYS NOT FOUND....REBOOTING UNIVERSE. |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 10:41:05 EDT
From: Kenneth Dare <102226.1213@c.......>
Subject: What's on?
HI all.
I'm going to be gone for a few day (I better get my CD before I leave!!!), I
just saw Fever and wanted to know what comes on this week. Need to know if I
will have to set the VCR.
Thanks
--------------
Brandy
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 11:16:55 -0400
From: "Gaylin J. Walli" <gjwalli@m.......>
Subject: FK copyrights?
Just out of curiosity, has anyone taken a good look at the closing
credits for seasons 1, 2, and 3 and noted the copyright holders of
the FK "stuff" for each of those seasons? Someone off list asked me
about this and I couldn't honestly give them a straight answer other
than "Uh, I think Sony/Tristar" which is most likely wrong.
Any idea? I don't have a videotape in front of me...
Jasmine, gjwalli@m......., Faithful Ravenette
http://www.hu.mtu.edu/~gjwalli/fktoc.html
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 08:05:00 PT
From: Tami Lafrank <tamilyn.lafrank@a.......>
Subject: Every 54 years
No, had the same thought. And imagine, Nick managed to stay with her thru
at least one of the cycles. If the average woman has PMS for about a week,
then vampires must have it for about 6 weeks? <shudder> Good time to not
be within a country of a female vampire.And what do they substitute for
chocolate? It's what usually keeps me from killing my family during that
particular time frame. :)
Janette was PMS is even more frightening than being locked in a small room
with a hungry LC.
Tami LaFrank : TCL58@a....... or TCL20@a.......
Forever Faithful Ravenette :
Owner: Sacred Raven Health Spa : His hair glistened in the rain like
"Come in, relax. We're dying : like nose hair after a sneeze.
to prolong your life" : Stupidity *should* be painful!
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 08:22:22 -0700
From: AKR <r@w.......>
Subject: Re: Prince Nick (was Re: Is Nick a snob?)
On Tue, 9 Apr 1996, Sandra Gray wrote:
> When she looked back at Nick after LC stopped her, she looked angry...
Fair enough. Goodness! A reason to go rewatch SoB... <g>
However, it seems relevant to the "prince Nick" analysis to point out
that she surely knew just who she was hitting on in that initial scene --
knew his reputation, and how LC feels about that reputation.
Just a thought. :)
******* Amy, Lady of the Knight (AKR) r@w....... *******
"The mighty mountains bare their fangs unto the moon" --Robert Service
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 11:26:55 -0400
From: Matthew F Funke <mff@h.......>
Subject: Re: BB Questions
> > 5) If you're in a plane, and it is crashing, what would happen if
> > you jumped up as high as you can, right as the plane hit the ground?
>
> You'd hit the ceiling <g>, and fly backwards like a shot, as far as the
> plane is concerned. Someone watching you from the ground outside would
> see you standing still (well, more or less), as far as they were
> concerned, if that's what you're fishing for.
No! It's not as if they enter the air and are magically transported
into a reference frame that is fixed with respect to the rest of planet
Earth! They don't die because they stop moving as fast as the plane and
suddenly slam into its rear. They die because they're not able to take
away much of the speed of a screaming plane with their measly little leg
muscles. You don't just suddenly stop moving. Stewardesses tell us not
to unbuckle our safety belts because we stand a (slightly) better chance
of survival if we are restrained by the belt and don't go flying towards
the front of the plane when it suddenly stops moving, hitting random
stuff and people along the way.
-- Lost in the Shadows,
Dr Funke (mff@h.......)
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 08:32:15 -0700
From: AKR <r@w.......>
Subject: YKYB... Lit. Edition
I'm on my way to a 17th-Century Lit exam, and I've got these pernicious
FK associations that refuse to leave me alone...
Herrick's "Farewell to Sack"? Nick's "Farewell to Blood"!!!
Marvell's "The Nymph Complaining for the Death of her Fawn"? Urs!!!
Lovelace's "To Lucasta, Going to the Wars"? Nick to Nat!!!
I don't suppose any of the essay questions will be, "What did LaCroix
think of Cavalier poetry?"... darn it. :)
******* Amy, Lady of the Knight (AKR) r@w....... *******
"The mighty mountains bare their fangs unto the moon" --Robert Service
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 11:04:53 +0200
From: Connie Gartrell <STUGARTRECD@m.......>
Subject: Re: FK CD-What CD?
ME TOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
On Mon, 8 Apr 1996, L. Katherine Queen wrote:
> Hi gang,
> Will someone please give me info on this mystery CD.You know the basic
> four W's.What, Where, Who and Why. Thanks
>
> Katherine, of the newly Knighted...ever-closer to Knightie-dom
> lqueen@p.......
>
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 12:15:43 -0400
From: "Nancy A. Taylor" <NancyT503@a.......>
Subject: YKYB...
YKYB Reading This List Too Long When you dream about reading the list,
posting to the list, reading the list, e-mailing your list friends, reading
the list....all night long. Sigh. Why couldn't I have some good Knightie
dreams like Nick with his shirt unbuttoned... Nick with his shirt *off*...
just out the shower... Hmmm, yeah, that's better. :)
Dame Nancy (NancyT503@a.......)
Proud Knight(ie) of the List
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 12:17:29 EDT
From: Tanya Smith <bodybldr@v.......>
Subject:CDCDCDCDCDCDCD...
need info on CDCDCD
forever knight
thanks
tanya
lacroix' lover
nicholas' nightmaid
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 09:36:22 -0500
From: Janice Cox <jancox@v.......>
Subject: Re: Prince Nick (was Re: Is Nick a snob?)
At 02:47 AM 4/9/96 -0500, Sandra Gray wrote:
Vamp
>sex might get a bit rough, but Nick seemed more intent on exercising
>power over her when he was choking her rather than pleasure. Demon
>influence, I expect.
Of course you'd add the "demon influence" bit, Sandra! ;-) Heaven forbid ole
Nickie enjoying his walk on the darker side just a little... Actually, I
agree, but it's much more fun to take a poke at such a dedicated Knightie!
Seriously, tho--could it be the the female vamp was afraid he'd just squeeze
until he ripped her head right off? Stragulation is of course unpleasant,
but it's not like she was going to suffocate or anything. While Uncle
frequently taunts Nick for being weak because of the lack of blood drinking,
I think he means it *relatively*. Nick's old enough that he can be pretty
physically threatening to the younger folk--when he wants to! Even Vachon,
who's getting up there himself, is a little careful around him...
On a lighter note: On the bus to work every day I pass our live theater, who
has been performing Sound of Music. Next up is, of course, Natalie Needs a
Nightie... Too much tequila some Saturday night and I'm going to add that "K".
Off I go--
Janice
"Badges? We don't need no steeenking badges!"
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 12:43:35 EDT
From: Tanya Smith <bodybldr@v.......>
Subject: Rosebud
Does anyone know where I can reach Rosebud? I seemed to have lost his email
address. (-:
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 11:53:24 CST-6CDT
From: Leann Lapp <LAPPL@a.......>
Subject: Re: Audiobooks-need information
Hope this is going to list in general. Need more information on the
audiobooks. I would like to order them through my local bookstore if
possible but the need to know author or editor in an effort to
located it so they can possible order for me. Any help appreciated.
Thanks Leann Lapp lappl@a.......
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 12:33:40 -0400
From: "Susan M. Garrett" <susang@v.......>
Subject: Janette and LaCroix
All right, I'll dive into the discussion about the relationship between
Janette and LaCroix--
I've always found it interesting that LaCroix, having been brought across
circa 79 AD, waited as long as 900-1000 to bring across a companion he
intended to keep with him. Perhaps he had failures previously (a comment on
why Nick has so much trouble with successful converts; it's a skill mastered
through trial and error and he hasn't quite learned how to judge potential
converts or how to guide them through their vampire infancy?), which we've
never seen. Hopefully, "Ashes to Ashes" might reveal something in an aside
or comment.
It is also interesting that Nick is 'chosen' not that long after--1228. Had
LaCroix's success with Janette made him confident enough to try again? Or
had his first thousand years made him more aware of the requirements he
would wish for companions for the years that yet awaited him? I can
certainly see him planning carefully, making mental lists of attributes that
would satisfy his intellectual and physical requirements as well as those
necessary for survival and success as a vampire who could last past several
centuries. There are certain personality types who would make charming
short-lived vampires, but would burn too hot and falter too quickly.
As to Janette--she had a sense of self-preservation to rival his own
(fighting off the soldiers because she knew her pimp would beat her if they
had her for free), beauty, intelligence, spirit . . . his observation of her
seems to have been as thorough as necessary. He offers her what she thinks
is freedom through power, but which is in actuality just another form of
enslavement. Did Janette fight, when she found her wings clipped? Probably
not, as LaCroix has proven accurate in his assessments and knew enough not
to confine her too much, reigning her in to remind her who her master was
and for her own protection. In addition, he observed that she had grown
resigned to her mortal fate, acquiescing and surviving rather than fighting
to the death what she could not change. This characteristic would make her
perfect for his plans.
What we have seen of the two of them together seems to lend credence to this
theory--Janette has a loyalty to LaCroix that he does not often show to her
(she is second best in his eyes, as when he tells Nicholas to leave her
behind when she falters). Perhaps that is her acknowledgment of the gift he
has given her; Janette's loyalty is not fealty (in which a liegeman vows to
remain loyal to his Lord so long as the Lord honors the contract between
them), but absolute and generally unconditional with the possible exception
of Nick's immediate well-being.
In "Father's Day," the scene in which Janette tells LaCroix where Nicholas
has gone was shot two ways. The one we saw showed Janette being stoic,
LaCroix threatening with what seemed the slightest pressure of a hand on her
neck and shoulder and a voice of whispered warning. The alternate scene was
the same in dialogue if not in detail--Janette is crying and LaCroix's grip
is obviously hurting her (they are positioned the same, with him standing
behind her). He shouts his threats at her until she capitulates.
The former was the correct choice and far more appropriate for these
characters. These two have been together for so long that they know
something of each other's minds and souls. Yes, the former scene makes
Janette look cold in betraying Nicholas, but it brings home the eventuality
that LaCroix WILL win no matter what she does and Janette knows this. This
is a scene that has no doubt been repeated a number of times in their
history. And, for all they know, will be repeated yet again.
Regards
susang@v....... -- http://www.vitinc.com/~susang
Faithful Ravenette, because somebody STILL has to.
Discover the power of Forever Knight at
http://members.aol.com/CuznJamiMR/SaveForeverKnight.html
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 12:10:18 +0200
From: Connie Gartrell <STUGARTRECD@m.......>
Subject: Re: umm
OK OK OK OK I admit it I WATCHED THE WHOLE THING!!!!!!!!!! FORGIVE
ME! I have sinned I know but I accutally sat through all 60 minutes of
it, and (GULP) I hate to admit it but I enjoyed some of it.
Cousin Connie
On Wed, 3 Apr 1996, Muldy Sculler wrote:
> I managed to watch 18 mins. yes, 18 mins. on the most boring stuff I
> have ever seen--Kindred: The Useless.I did not waste anymore time.
> Barbara
>
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 10:40:28 -0700
From: AKR <r@w.......>
Subject: Re: Rosebud
On Tue, Tanya Smith wrote:
> Does anyone know where I can reach Rosebud? I seemed to have lost his email
> address. (-:
< Rosebud@raven.com > Naturally. < G >
******* Amy, Lady of the Knight (AKR) r@w....... *******
Bright Knightie, Light Cousin, Fleur-Booster, (Im)Mortal Beloved
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 10:49:46 -0700
From: AKR <r@w.......>
Subject: Re: Every 54 years
You do all realize, don't you, that if that particular bodily function is
compatible with immortality, so would be pregnancy? After all, healing
factor and viability everything, her eggs predate her vampirism. Anybody
want to calculate fertile times?
I can't believe I'm contributing to this madness... <g>
******* Amy, Lady of the Knight (AKR) r@w....... *******
"The mighty mountains bare their fangs unto the moon" --Robert Service
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 13:50:55 -0700
From: Lisa Reeves <ad483@d.......>
Subject: Re: Liking Third Season
Bonnela Pardoe wrote:
> >Mercs, how much chocolate to kidnap it for me?
>
> Tsk, tsk, tsk -- bringing in Mercs to handle an internal Vaquero 'issue'.
> I'm disappointed in you, Apache. Don't you think we can work something out
> without involving those... those... parasites? Besides, it would take a
> heckva lot more than anything the Mercs might have at their disposal to get
> that scene away from me. <veg>
Ahem. Parasites????
Parasites???????????????????????
--
Lisa Reeves @-->--->--- | ad483@d.......
GDFN Help Staff Co-Administrator | Mercenary for Chocolate
Save Forever Knight! Site for details:
http://members.aol.com/CuznJamiMR/SaveForeverKnight.html
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 11:02:06 -0700
From: AKR <r@w.......>
Subject: Vampiric Balance
Tracy doesn't seem to have any objections to vampirism, does she?
Ok, so she can't say the word out loud, but morally?
I was just pondering the whole cast change thing... It used to be:
LaCroix
|
Janette-----Nick-----Natalie
|
Schanke
But I was unable to diagram the current relationships in any similar
manner, and it occurred to me that it is because now, in a certain sense,
Tracy, Vachon, Urs, Screed and LC are all standing on the same side of
Nick -- approving of vampirism -- and that Nat isn't enough of a
counterbalance all on her own. I think the weight of the other
characters' attitudes has contributed to Nick's backsliding. Thoughts?
******* Amy, Lady of the Knight (AKR) r@w....... *******
"The mighty mountains bare their fangs unto the moon" --Robert Service
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 14:13:42 -0400
From: Melanie Hernandez <Gitanita@a.......>
Subject: FK CD info
Greetings All!
Well since there was *so* much acclaim for the FK CD, I finally broke down
and ordered it today! And since there were a few questions about the CD and
ordering info, I thought I'd post the info I got in the end of March...
<<The CD is now available for direct mail-order. Stores like Sam Goody, Tower
and others won't have it until sometime later.
For VISA or Mastercard orders please call GNP at
1-800-654-7029
CDs are $12.98 ea. plus $3.00 postage and shipping.
(Buy three, get one free)
Cassettes are $8. 98 plus $3.00 postage and shipping.
(Same deal applies)
or send check or money orders for the above amounts to GNP/Crescendo Records
8400 Sunset Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90069
USA
Turnaround time for orders is usually a week to ten days.>>
I can't wait to get mine! I was told 2 weeks wait at the most...
Too excited,
~Melanie~
*Newly converted Dark Knightie*Ravenette*Immortal Beloved*FoSiL*
*Newly strengthened Vaquera*
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 14:13:40 -0400
From: Siona <siona@n.......>
Subject: Re: mysterious legends beyond
At 01:49 AM 4/9/96 -0500, Heather wrote:
>long. They also filmed part of the show in Toronto, about some rock singer
>who drank blood and his girlfriend (wierd). I was wondering if this is some
He drank his girlfriend? Sorry, couldn't resist :)
Siona@n.......
Dark Knightie!
Help save Forever Knight! see http://www.netaxs.com/~siona/
"Murphy was an optimist!"
Lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on mine.
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 13:22:11 -0500
From: Sandra Gray <TMP_HARKINS@d.......>
Subject: Re: Prince Nick (was Re: Is Nick a snob?)
Janice Cox writes:
>Heaven forbid ole Nickie enjoying his walk on the darker side just a
>little...
Well, I was only speaking about demon influence in reference to the
choking. ;) And to whoever it was who mentioned choking could be an
aid to better orgasm, that may be so, but it still seemed to me that
she wasn't enjoying being choked so I don't think it was stimulating
her sexual pleasure. Besides that, Nick isn't usually shown being
anywhere *near* that kinky romancing other women. And I don't think
that under normal circumstances he'd keep up with an activity that
his partner was not finding pleasureable.
--Sandra Gray, forever Knightie
--tmp_harkins@d.......
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 11:19:26 -0800
From: John Soo-Hoo <galahad!jsoohoo@n.......>
>Subject:CDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCD...
>need info on CDCDCD
>forever knight
>thanks
>tanya
>lacroix' lover
>nicholas' nightmaid
There number and address are
GNP/Cresendo Records
8400 Sunset Blvd.
Hollywood, Ca. 90069
1-800-654-7029
cds 12.98+3.00 P&S
Cassettes 8.98+3.00 P&S
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 10:32:39 -0800
From: John Soo-Hoo <galahad!jsoohoo@n.......>
Subject: Re: Every 54 years
>Someone extrapolated that, based on that once every ten minutes heart
>beat, female vampires would only menstruate every 54 years.
>Am I the only one who immediately had an horrific vision of Janette
>with PMS?
Actually no, although I wouldn't say it would be horrific... I would say
Janette is one who looks beautiful when she is angry. :)
Of course I would observe this from a distance, surrounded by crosses, crates
of garlic, and munching on a large plate of spagetti with a generous portions
of meatsauce.
John
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 13:36:42 -0500
From: Sandra Gray <TMP_HARKINS@d.......>
Subject: Re: Every 54 years
Amy writes:
>her eggs predate her vampirism. Anybody want to calculate fertile times?
I'd make a comment, but that episode is under spoiler protection. :)
--Sandra Gray, forever Knightie
--tmp_harkins@d.......
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 13:44:43 CDT
From: L'Phantom <jrarmstr@p.......>
Subject: Re: Vampiric Balance
Actually, I would have put Urs on the other side; she never wanted to be a
vampire; her entire existance is abhorrent to her, which would almost put her
diametrically opposite LC.
However, as with Nat v. Tracy/Vachon/Screed , Urs v. LaCroix is hopelessly
outmatched. But look again; it is just Nick that these people are influencing?
Try this diagram on for size:
"Good"|
| Urs Nat
| | /------------------------------X |
| | / /--------/-Tracy
|Vachon --------------Nick --/
| | /------------/ |
| | / Janette
|LaCroix -------------/
"Evil"|_____________________________________________
Vampire Mortal
Now to interpret:
On a scale from "good" to "evil" in human terms, LaCroix and Janette fall in
the lower half, Tracy, Nat, and (IMO) Urs fall in the upper. Nick and Vachon
are right in the middle I think, seeing that Vachon has no problem being a
vampire, but does accept his responsibility for Tracy. Nick tries so hard to
be a "good" person, but because of the vampire in him, he feels he cannot
overcome that. On the other scale, from "Vampire" to "Mortal", Nick and
Janette
are in the middle because of Nick's quest and Janette's... well, spoilers lie a
along *that* path.
The lines of influence indicate the direction each character is trying to pull
each other character along this chart. EX: LaCroix is pulling Nick down and
left, to the zero-point of the graph.
(How's *that* for complex character interaction? :) )
Straying from your mind into your left shoulder, just coz I can,
The "New and Improved" L'Phantom
Now a Cousin in full standing!
http://bsc.edu/~jrarmstr/
Help Save Forever Knight! Ask me how! jrarmstr@b.......
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 14:45:56 -0400
From: Carrie Krumtum <Carrie400@a.......>
Subject: Re: Every 54 years
In a message dated 96-04-09 11:27:28 EDT, you write:
>And what do they substitute for
>chocolate?
A merc after payday!
Carrie,
Proud Knightie
Carrie400@a.......
=========================================================================
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 13:53:46 +0200
From: Connie Gartrell <STUGARTRECD@m.......>
Subject: Re: Blood/Blood Light Recipes
I also would like the recipies, my who family is in to the FK.
=========================================================================
Knight graphics and parchment background created by Melissa Snell and may be found at http://historymedren.about.com/
