There are 6 messages totalling 123 lines in this issue. Topics of the day: 1. Number One Son (4) 2. FORKNI-L Digest - 7 Jun 2008 to 10 Jun 2008 (#2008-136) 3. Good News! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:21:26 -0700 From: Kristen Fife <fenix23fyre@y.......> Subject: Number One Son I was watching "Ashes to Ashes" and Divia's interactions with LC and it got me to thinking. She rightly surmised that Nick was LC's "favorite", and it made me wonder if Nick's quest for humanity, the struggle *against* LaCroix, was what made him the favored offspring? Perhaps it was the struggle and clash of wills? Thoughts? Kristen Fife, Author http://tinyurl.com/2wgmdg In Memory of Tuffer -1/9/02-11/15/07 ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:31:59 -0700 From: ChicagoMel <sgt_buck_frobisher@y.......> Subject: Re: FORKNI-L Digest - 7 Jun 2008 to 10 Jun 2008 (#2008-136) Might I ask,what's a MadNatter? I'm not sure I've heard of that faction before Thanks Mel -------------- Stephanie Babbitt (sbabbitt@bellsouth.net), Atlanta, GA Vaquera (Because I Can), MadNatter, N&NPacker Nobody Dies. Nobody Ever Died. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:17:50 -0400 From: Deborah Hymon <debh@e.......> Subject: Re: Number One Son on 6/12/08 12:21 AM, Kristen Fife at fenix23fyre@y....... wrote: > I was watching "Ashes to Ashes" and Divia's interactions with LC > and it got me > to thinking. She rightly surmised that Nick was LC's "favorite", and it made > me wonder if Nick's quest for humanity, the struggle *against* LaCroix, was > what made him the favored offspring? Perhaps it was the struggle and clash of > wills? Thoughts? > Kristen Fife, Author > http://tinyurl.com/2wgmdg > In Memory of Tuffer -1/9/02-11/15/07 > > > > ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:51:58 -0400 From: Portia <portia1@m.......> Subject: Re: Good News! Yay for the good news!!! Keep your head above your shoulders and your face off the floor from now on, Laurie! ;o) Hugs, Portia ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:01:03 -0400 From: "Phillips, Tim" <Tim.Phillips@s.......> Subject: Re: Number One Son > it made me wonder if Nick's quest for humanity, the struggle > *against* >LaCroix, was what made him the favored offspring? Realistically...it was because the show was "Forever Knight" not "The Darkness of Ducharme". Any show built around a central character will have that character at the center of darn near everything. Leaving reality aside and stepping into the world of the show....would it make sense (given LaCroix's cultural history) that he would favor any son over a daughter simply on the basis of gender?? Not enormously...mind you... as a vampire LaCroix is clearly in control of whom he adds to his "family". If he really didn't feel daughters were worthy, he would have never turned Janette....unless he was seeking some replacement for Divia??? Now that could be a truly twisted idea depending upon how you wiggle it. I have always found it "odd" that LaCroix has only two "acknowledged" children that he keeps in long-term contact with. He waited over a thousand years to create Janette... and centuries more passed (and it was clearly much her idea), before he crossed Nick over. Yes, there have been others, but they are darn near vampire equivalents of the "neck 'o the week". You never hear or see them again after the particular episode that they are part of. Clearly no one would write a series of novels without some justification for these enormous spans of time that LaCroix spent alone...or the complete indifference he seems to have toward his "children" aside Nick and Janette. Tim ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:27:53 -0400 From: Michele Azuddin <mobody@g.......> Subject: Re: Number One Son I think if the show were centered around LaCroix his "children" would come more into play. Again, its the Nick Knight Show. Who knows what LC is doing when he isn't focused on Nick On 6/12/08, Phillips, Tim <Tim.Phillips@s.......> wrote: > > Yes, there have been others, but they are darn near vampire > equivalents of the "neck 'o the week". You never hear or see them again > after the particular episode that they are part of. > ------------------------------ End of FORKNI-L Digest - 11 Jun 2008 to 12 Jun 2008 (#2008-138) ***************************************************************
![]() Previous |
![]() This month's list |
![]() Next |