There are 5 messages totaling 225 lines in this issue. Topics of the day: 1. WAR: Re: Admin: 1st war anniversary (5) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:22:37 -0500 From: Greer Watson <gwatson2@r.......> Subject: WAR: Re: Admin: 1st war anniversary On Fri, 8 Nov 2013, Bonnie wrote: > I think a premise-less & WM-less war could work, as long > as people were willing to be self-starters and come to the > party with some ideas of their own to get some balls rolling. Well, that's the question, isn't it? Last time, there were certainly a few factions that came with plans. Others didn't, though: they expected to react to what the other factions were doing. Self-starting isn't everyone's gig. If we had a less *arduous* premise than the last one, it might maybe serve as a sort of "handy hint" for factions that are finding it hard to come up with something. Or hard to get together to discuss it: communications can be slow as molasses sometimes. (All it takes, you know, is for the faction leader to have an internet outage.) Now, McLisa responded to my reminder that there were two *unused* premises from the last war. She said: > In the first place, I don't still have them. In the second place, > not on Fkfic-l, because that would require the appointment of > a WM, who is usually the person who submitted the chosen > premise. Well first off, *you* may not have the old premises; but the people who submitted them both remember what they suggested. (I'm one of them.) And, of course, there may be other people with new ideas. Couldn't *all* potential premises be posted for people to see and vote on? Of course, that would mean that everyone would know in advance. The premise would not be a secret, as it has been in the past. But it's clear that, if we're to have another war, it will have to be played by somewhat new rules anyway. Also, if the premise was picked by *vote*, you wouldn't have that duty. Of course, one of the options to vote on would have to be not having a premise at all. After all, Bonnie and you both like that idea; and there are probably others who agree. Comments anyone? Greer gwatson2@r....... http://www.foreverknight.org/FK4/ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:39:43 -0500 From: g4akl@c....... Subject: Re: WAR: Re: Admin: 1st war anniversary >Greer said: >Couldn't *all* potential premises be posted for people to see and >vote on? Of course, that would mean that everyone would know in >advance. The premise would not be a secret, as it has been in the >past. But it's clear that, if we're to have another war, it will >have to be played by somewhat new rules anyway. > >Also, if the premise was picked by *vote*, you wouldn't have that duty. > >Of course, one of the options to vote on would have to be not having >a premise at all. After all, Bonnie and you both like that idea; >and there are probably others who agree. > >Comments anyone? Another idea would be to have a self-appointed committee decide on which premise(s) they favored.Such self-appointed committee could be made up of premise submitters and previous warmistresses for example. Personally, since I've never played in a premise-less war, that option doesn't appeal to me so much. However I DO remember one war whose premise was so unappealing that I (a faction leader) just ignored it completely. Arletta ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:43:13 +0000 From: nancykam@c....... Subject: Re: WAR: Re: Admin: 1st war anniversary ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greer Watson" <gwatson2@r.......> > If we had a less *arduous* premise than the last one, it might maybe serve > as a sort of "handy hint" for factions that are finding it hard to come up > with something. Or hard to get together to discuss it: communications can > be slow as molasses sometimes. (All it takes, you know, is for the faction > leader to have an internet outage.) I'm with keep it extremely simple. Just set up a premise, for example, "Let's all go to Toronto and have one great party to celebrate the anniversary." The finer detail could revolve around renting, say, Casa Loma for a night. Chaos could ensue---mishaps with the catering, accidental damage to the venerable property that must be fixed, sub-parties in those palatial stables (connected by a tunnel to the main house, just imagine the possibilities), goings-on on the roof (accessed through the attic and yes, open to the public). Etc. There's lots of scope for goofiness there, and people could just play as individuals and interact as a faction member with other individuals. Add our FK characters walking in and out of the picture, causing trouble, and you could have fun with it. Plus, this has the added feature of not having to solve a mystery of any sort. Just leave the venue in the shape we found it. I thought of Casa Loma because it's got an extensive website that people can look at to understand the possibilities of story lines there. I once toured it so I remember what it looks like in person. (A side note, it was frequently a location used in lots of syndicated shows---I remember Nikita used it as some kind of Eastern European prison, and another time Nikita and Michael had to creep through that tunnel that connects the house to the stables). Just a thought, Nancy Kaminski ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:27:56 -0500 From: L McDavid <mclisa1014@g.......> Subject: Re: WAR: Re: Admin: 1st war anniversary Nancy Kaminski writes: >I'm with keep it extremely simple. Just set up a premise, for example, "Let's all go to Toronto and have one great party to celebrate the anniversary." The finer detail could revolve around renting, say, Casa Loma for a night. Chaos could ensue---mishaps with the catering, accidental damage to the venerable property that must be fixed, sub-parties in those palatial stables (connected by a tunnel to the main house, just imagine the possibilities), goings-on on the roof (accessed through the attic and yes, open to the public). Etc. There's lots of scope for goofiness there, and people could just play as individuals and interact as a faction member with other individuals.< I like this, and hope it's what we coose. Casa Loma even has a secret passage,.which the builder used to get from his study to sanctuary upstairs when unwanted visitors arrived. : ) Plus, LaCroix could certainly do any hypnotizing necessary to keep us from being taken away by the Toronto police (there's probably a limit on Nick's influence <g>). The Raven could cater the refreshments. cLisa (Lisa McDavid) "That will be trouble." listowner, Forkni-l & Fkfic-l mclisa1014@g....... ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:37:24 -0500 From: L McDavid <mclisa1014@g.......> Subject: Re: WAR: Re: Admin: 1st war anniversary Well first off, *you* may not have the old premises; but the people who submitted them both remember what they suggested. (I'm one of them.) And, of course, there may be other people with new ideas. Couldn't *all* potential premises be posted for people to see and vote on? Gwen writes, answering me: >;Of course, that would mean that everyone would know in advance. The premise would not be a secret, as it has been in the past. But it's clear that, if we're to have another war, it will have to be played by somewhat new rules anyway< Fine by me, as long as the regular Fkfic-l rules are remembered and no flames start on either list. Don and I would both consider flames a reason to stop the war. I'm sure we'd all agree on that. . >Also, if the premise was picked by *vote*, you wouldn't have that duty. Problem: If the premise chosen somehow got the PSU listserv into legal trouble (I don't see how, but I have to consider all angles), Don and I as listowners would still be responsible for the content. Let's see what Don says. Don? Personally I'm willing to risk it, but I think Don and I had better keep the right to veto a premise if we think it's likely to cause trouble. In that remote event, I'd be open to negotiating for any necessary changes. >Couldn't *all* potential premises be posted for people to see and vote on? Of course, that would mean that everyone would know in advance. The premise would not be a secret, as it has been in the past. But it's clear that, if we're to have another war, it will have to be played by somewhat new rules anyway.< >Also, if the premise was picked by *vote*, you wouldn't have that duty.< I'm ok with both of these. >Of course, one of the options to vote on would have to be not having a premise at all. After all, Bonnie and you both like that idea; and there are probably others who agree.< Sure. I have a good deal of experience with no-premise on-list parties on the old Vampyres@guvm, so I'd be happy to explain how that works, if anyone would like to hear about it. McLisa (Lisa McDavid) "That will be trouble." listowner, Forkni-l & Fkfic-l mclisa1014@g....... ------------------------------ End of FORKNI-L Digest - 9 Nov 2013 to 11 Nov 2013 (#2013-179) **************************************************************
Previous |
This month's list |
Next |