There are 4 messages totaling 143 lines in this issue. Topics of the day: 1. Mortal snare (3) 2. Admin: 1st war anniversary ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 19:30:22 -0500 From: Greer Watson <gwatson2@r.......> Subject: Re: Mortal snare On Thu, 7 Nov 2013, Laurie of the Isles wrote: > I'm enjoying thinking about what LaCroix would > have to say on CERK about Toronto's current mayor. All the press in the world are having a field day. (Talk of the gift that keeps on giving!) So the Nightcrawler would be joining a large club, wouldn't he? Not his style: he likes to be unique. Of course, there's always the chance that he'd simply have a large snack--but I doubt it. He's having too much fun watching it all, I suspect. Now, I can see Nick trying a little whammy. "Go to rehab, go to rehab." I doubt if it would stick, though. As we know from "Unreality TV", these things don't last if something distracts the subject--and he's gone on record too often insisting that he's staying in office. On Fri, 8 Nov 2013, McLisa wrote: > H'mm, fanfic challenge, anyone? Tsk, tsk. And from one of our list mods, too. There are rules about that sort of thing. One would have to disguise the guilty. (I was going to say "thinly disguise"; but His Dishonour is noticeably portly.) Fake names would be in order, I suppose. Or one could hearken back to "Spin Doctor", and substitute the mayor from that. Not as much fun, though. Greer gwatson2@r....... http://www.foreverknight.org/FK4/ ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 19:32:09 -0800 From: Andrew Caruthers <slinter@j.......> Subject: Re: Mortal snare I think, in his urbane, Roman way, he'd avoid any smart cracks about the affair. On Fri, 8 Nov 2013 19:30:22 -0500 Greer Watson <gwatson2@r.......> writes: > On Thu, 7 Nov 2013, Laurie of the Isles wrote: > > > I'm enjoying thinking about what LaCroix would > > have to say on CERK about Toronto's current mayor. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 23:12:35 -0800 From: Bonnie <callalily@l.......> Subject: Re: Admin: 1st war anniversary I'll throw a looney into the hat and say that I'd play if we did another FKFIC-L war. I think a premise-less & WM-less war could work, as long as people were willing to be self-starters and come to the party with some ideas of their own to get some balls rolling. I have a few things I wouldn't mind doing and a few people I wouldn't mind doing them with - or to, as the case may be. So, yeah, I'm in. Bonnie callalily@l....... At 12:33 PM 11/7/2013 -0500, L McDavid wrote: >1. We can have a war on Fkfic-l which is like the first one. That is, >although we would give notice and I would undertake to keep permission >slips, (These are required in case PSU is ever threatened by a law >suit again for unauthorized use of a real person.) There would be no >premise and no w.m. The factions would play-fight until a conclusion >developed. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 12:28:02 -0500 From: L McDavid <mclisa1014@g.......> Subject: Re: Mortal snare On 11/8/13, Andrew Caruthers <slinter@j.......> wrote: > ---------------------- Information from the mail header > ----------------------- > Sender: Forever Knight TV show <FORKNI-L@l.......> > Poster: Andrew Caruthers <slinter@j.......> > Subject: Re: Mortal snare > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I think, in his urbane, Roman way, he'd avoid any smart cracks about > the affair. > > > > On Fri, 8 Nov 2013 19:30:22 -0500 Greer Watson <gwatson2@r.......> > writes: >> On Thu, 7 Nov 2013, Laurie of the Isles wrote: >> >> > I'm enjoying thinking about what LaCroix would >> > have to say on CERK about Toronto's current mayor. > ------------------------------ End of FORKNI-L Digest - 8 Nov 2013 to 9 Nov 2013 (#2013-178) *************************************************************
Previous |
This month's list |
Next |