FORKNI-L
FORKNI-L Digest - 15 Jul 2002 to 16 Jul 2002 - Special issue (#2002-209)
Tue, 16 Jul 2002
There are 31 messages totalling 1020 lines in this issue.
Topics in this special issue:
1. Last Knight (5)
2. Sci Fi Channel News (3)
3. My Last Knight Theory
4. twisted end (6)
5. Last Knight (my theory) (2)
6. Last Knight (yet another theory) (7)
7. Write to get new Knight! (4)
8. GWD in My Fair Lady (3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 17:24:09 EDT
From: SField8067@a.......
Subject: Re: Last Knight
Hi Everyone :)
Just a reminder from Kickstart the Knight.as depressing as most of us find
"Last Knight" to be, of course i am totally convinced it was just a nervous
breakdown nick had!,tommorrow starts the eps from season one again . YAY!
So please before or after it begins, please take the time to email Sci-Fi
(http://www.scifi.com) go to the feedback form,and let them know just how
much you are all enjoying having it back.And once a week if you all can just
keep doing it,the more we keep the interest up the better our chances of
getting other FK related things :) and who knows? maybe some more marathons!
KtK will keep trying on your behalf, but we need you all to do your bit for
the cause too.
Thanks everyone.. now go get those tapes ready for tommorrow!!
HUGS, susan
SField8067@a.......
KtK Fearless Leader
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 19:19:58 -0400
From: Mickey <wench@o.......>
Subject: Sci Fi Channel News
>News from the Sci Fi Channel released at the Television Critics Assn.
>(TCA) press tour which began yesterday in Pasadena: Sci Fi Channel will
>develop two more series projects based on Universal titles you've heard of
>before - Quantum Leap will begin as a two hour movie and pilot; and
>Tremors will become a one hour action series set to debut in
>January. These two projects add on to Sci Fi's other recent announcements
>to go forward with Firestarter: Rekindled series and Battlestar Galactica,
>a four hour original miniseries and series pilot. On the totally new and
>original series side The Dream Team with Anabelle and Michael featuring
>hosts Annabelle Gurwitch (Dinner & A Movie) and psychotherapist Michael
>Lennox who will look at the meanings behind dreams. Sci Fi has order 65
>episodes of the strip series; produced by Stone Stanley Entertainment,
>production begins this fall for a launch in January. And you've been
>hearing about this one for ever it seems, and finally it's on the schedule
>for December 2002: Steven Spielberg Presents Taken, a ten night
>television event covering three families and four generations.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 17:01:55 -0700
From: Emily <emilymhanson@y.......>
Subject: My Last Knight Theory
Ok, after watching Last Knight again, and getting teary-eyed at the end, I have
a theory.
1. As someone else mentioned, why were the monologues shown before the last
scene, when they actually occurred? The only logical reason I can think of is
that someone is remembering them and that they're really flashbacks. I'm
guessing Nick, but it could be LaCroix or Nat, if she was brought across in the
end, as well.
2. Why shoot the beginning scenes with the transferred prisoner, Dawkins
(sp?), in slow motion at all? There is no apparent reason to film the scene
where he breaks free in slow motion except to convey a surrealistic, dreamlike
effect. The duration of the first slow motion scene is much longer than most
shows would film, (except perhaps the Matrix). But again, I think that was
done very deliberately, to convey either a dream or someone remembering the
whole night after it had taken place.
My theory is that at the last second, Natalie woke up, having been
inadvertently brought across, and LaCroix tossed the stake away. The entire
episode could have been anyone's flashback, but I'm guessing it was Natalie's.
Later Nick, LaCroix, Natalie, and Janette all moved to an island in the
Carribean and are, at this moment, sitting on a beach under the palm trees
and drinking blood wine in the moonlight.
But then, it's only a theory.
=====
Emily M. Hanson
Homepage - http://www.starbase-eprime.us
My Web Graphics - http://www.galaxyofimages.us
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 19:22:54 -0500
From: DPHEIL <dpheil@a.......>
Subject: twisted end
Shows like this always put something weird at the end
A a Climax to see if there's enough of an audience to keep going
B If they do come back, they need a platform to start from
I wish this seiries would go another 10 years, but thats probably too much
to ask
Good thing season 1 starts tomarrow
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 18:10:28 -0700
From: Sunny LaCountess <countessa2000@y.......>
Subject: Re: Sci Fi Channel News
So basically, everyone got their wish 'cept for us.
:(
Well at least they're continuing the reruns
Sunny
--- Mickey <wench@o.......> wrote:
>> Sci Fi Channel will develop two more series projects
based on Universal titles you've heard of before -
Quantum Leap <snip> and Tremors <snip> add on to Sci Fi's
other recent announcements to go forward with
Firestarter: Rekindled series and Battlestar Galactica,<<
=====
LaCountess -- Twilight Knightie,IB,DT,UF,Cotk
http://www.lacountess.com/FKnight/
"Vampires are make believe, just like elves and gremlins and eskimos!"
--Homer Simpson
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 20:14:49 -0500
From: Mary Lynn Wirick <n.debrabant@g.......>
Subject: Re: Last Knight (my theory)
I'm sorry Kristin,
I just don't buy your theory.
Just because LaCroix is standing
behind Nick and part of the monologue
is missing, still doesn't't convince me.
And as for what ds stated, I'm afraid I
don't buy into that theory either.
Mary Lynn
> From: Kristin <kris1228@e.......>
> Date: 2002/07/15 Mon PM 02:32:16 CDT
> To: FORKNI-L@l.......
> Subject: Re: Last Knight (my theory)
>
> Here's my theory on "Last Knight," and no I am not the first to think this.
> When I first saw LK back in 1996, I thought LaCroix staked Natalie for Nick.
> I never thought it possible for it to be for Nick till I read
> interpretations on the internet. How could he? Nick's his favorite. I don't
> think LaCroix could live on without Nick. Anyway, here is my interpretation
> based on what others have said on the Sci-fi Bboard a few years ago. I've
> come to believe this is how it ended...
>
> As you all know, LaCroix's monologues are said throughout the episode
> "before" they actually happen. We see most of these repeat at the end of the
> episode after Nick has drained Natalie. However, not all are repeated. We
> must ask ourselves where did these go then? There is one important one
> particularly:
>
> [LaCroix is at the loft, standing behind a crouching Nick. He tells him how
> a vampire staying past their time is death, and reminds Nick what he taught
> him so many years ago. We then see the flashback of LaCroix leaving Fluer.
> "Leaving is the purest form of love," and Nick turns to him...]
>
> This one appears to belong after the rising of the stake. Also notice that
> LaCroix is *behind* Nick, exactly how the end was. "Last Knight" was
> deliberately made uniquely and mixed up to make us think and wonder. This
> conclusion does make sense and, therefore, shows proof that Nick and LaCroix
> could have very well moved on together, alive and well. Now here's my
> slant... maybe, they could meet up with Janette too. Nick was thinking about
> her in the flashes we see as he drinks from Natalie. :)
>
> Hope this helps you all to understand it better. Arcblade, from Sci-fi's
> bboard, explained it better some time ago. I don't know where his post is
> now though. Now if only TPTB would make a new movie to help fix all the
> confusion.
>
> Kristin
> http://knightvision.4ever.cc
> "When you only have eyes for the Knight..."
>
> > I have watched this episode several times.
> > I just don't see where Nick and LaCroix live on.
> > I have put the monologues together
>
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 18:22:55 -0700
From: Sunny LaCountess <countessa2000@y.......>
Subject: Re: Last Knight
The endless forever Last Knight...denial, denial and even
more denial.
I admit, it is pretty depressing for a last ep. and sadly
enough, pretty unnecessary. I agree with all who say they
put a twist in there (well Ger did, James, as it seemed,
was quite willing to kill 'em all) to leave room for the
possibility of coming back.
What bothered me about this episode though was the
irrational behavior of every character. Tracy is too slow
and careless for a cop, Nat is suddenly suicidal, no
longer the wise, considerate one, Nick does what he's
vowed not to do for over a century, and LaCroix…, like
they can go ahead and explain how he would be willing to
leave his favorite son behind or worse, stake him. I just
don't buy it, unless it is supposed to be someone's bad
dream.
Sunny
=====
LaCountess -- Twilight Knightie,IB,DT,UF,Cotk
http://www.lacountess.com/FKnight/
"Vampires are make believe, just like elves and gremlins and eskimos!"
--Homer Simpson
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 20:42:53 -0500
From: Nancy Kaminski <nancykam@a.......>
Subject: Re: Last Knight (my theory)
> Mary Lynn Wirick wrote:
> I'm sorry Kristin, I just don't buy your theory.
> Just because LaCroix is standing behind Nick and part of the monologue
> is missing, still doesn't't convince me. And as for what ds stated, I'm
> afraid I don't buy into that theory either.
I have to agree with Mary Lynn. I find it wholly understandable for LC to stake
Nick, especially after Nick told him that LC was his closest friend. It's
relevant to note that in Roman society, a man who had to commit suicide for
reasons of honor (or because he was ordered to) would sometimes ask his best
friend to perform the deed. It would be almost an act of love for the friend to
perform this final favor.
It could be argued that the dreamlike quality of the entire episode is Nick's
memories as he dies. After all, we've gone for three years seeing flashbacks
through Nick's eyes---this could be the final flashback. Add to that the final
scene of the sun rising over Toronto---perhaps that symbolizes Nick going into
the light at last.
This episode can be argued seven ways from Sunday---as for me, I prefer to
think of it as the tragic, yet somehow hopeful, ending of a tragic story. I do
regret that they cut the Romeo and Juliet soliliquies; that would have added to
much to the tragedy.
Nancy Kaminski
nancykam@a.......
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 22:17:21 -0400
From: Debbie Clarke <dittany121@h.......>
Subject: Re: Last Knight
I generally just skip watching the episode. I never understood why TPTB
chose to end the series that way. Unless they wanted to make sure that the
FK would not return in any shape or form . After all how could it everyone
died..
Having written that It particularly bothered me that
A Nick who only just managed to survive in Ashes to Ashes was killed by
LaCroix in the very next episode Last Knight.
B Natalie apparently lost her mind and decided on the Janette cure without
really understanding what had actually happened. I thought she was a
scientist. For all she knew it might have been something unique in
robert's blood which brought about the cure. Besides which surely it would
have made sense to make sure Nick was well fed first. before offering
herself as a sacrificial lamb.
C And tell me why did they need to call Nick to the precinct to go
after the escaped prisoner? He is not the only cop they have. Supposing
the escape had happened in the daylight. They knew Nick was helping
Natalie deal with the fact she had just lost friend to suicide. I realize
Nick explained this by saying whats his name (sorry but I have not
looked at the episode for at least 5 years) might listen to him because he
had arrested him once. ???? Why would he? This is not my Idea of the
beginning of a beautiful friendship between them.
D. .I accept Nick might act irrationally and Natalie might have act
irrationally but LaCroix? What was he thinking. What was his excuse for
letting the situation get so out of hand?
Just my two cents worth.
Debbie
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 21:31:27 -0500
From: Kristin <kris1228@e.......>
Subject: Re: Last Knight
No, they did not show anyone die, except Tracy. Anyway, what I originally
was trying to point out is that there IS evidence in "Last Knight" that Nick
survived and moved on with LaCroix.
Remember: "Forgiveness is not something you ask for. It is something you
*earn*...here...among the living." -Nick (Near Death)
May he keep earning...
Kristin
http://knightvision.4ever.cc
"When you only have eyes for the Knight..."
> I generally just skip watching the episode. I never understood why TPTB
> chose to end the series that way. Unless they wanted to make sure that the
> FK would not return in any shape or form . After all how could it everyone
> died..
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:01:40 +0800
From: Elliza Rahim <relliza@h.......>
Subject: Re: Last Knight (yet another theory)
First off I am of that school of thought <as Sunny wrote>: The endless
forever Last Knight...denial, denial and even more denial.
But if LK (Big IF) did happen then my theory is:
1)Lacroix clonked Nick on the head into unconsciousness with the stake.
2)He then flew off to the emergency room with Nat, disguised the bite marks
and whammied the staff into saving her.
3)Takes off with Nick, sequesters him. LC now has extra leverage to extract
"obedience" from Nick because Nick now owes Nat's life to LC. Nick and Nat
have all the freedom to act stupidly (and out of chracter) because they were
emotionally overwrought that night. But The General will always think many,
many steps ahead. There is no benefit for LC if Nick is dead and he well
knows that Nick doesn't want to live on with Nat gone.
By saving Nat and taking Nick away, he gives Nick a "cooling off" period and
will have the future option of adding Nat to his entourage later. LC does
after all, think she's an exceptional mortal and if brought across later,
will have the potential of making eternity even more interesting (or at
least bind his favorite son closer to him).
Well, my theory anyway.
Ell
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 20:29:24 -0700
From: Sunny LaCountess <countessa2000@y.......>
Subject: Re: Last Knight (yet another theory)
It's a great theory, Ell. I like it too. :)
Cheers
Sunny
--- Elliza Rahim <relliza@h.......> wrote:
> Well, my theory anyway.
> Ell
>
=====
LaCountess -- Twilight Knightie,IB,DT,UF,Cotk
http://www.lacountess.com/FKnight/
"Vampires are make believe, just like elves and gremlins and eskimos!"
--Homer Simpson
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 22:30:31 -0500
From: DPHEIL <dpheil@a.......>
Subject: Re: twisted end
I just asked LaCroix if he staked nick in the last episode
http://www.ScreedWasHere.com/ForeverPsychic/
He said:
(It's always about you)
Yeah! Age before mortality!
. . . . From the horse's mouth . . .
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 22:39:06 -0500
From: Kristin <kris1228@e.......>
Subject: Re: Last Knight (yet another theory)
Yes, I could easily accept that one too. :) Great job Ell!
Kristin
http://knightvision.4ever.cc
"When you only have eyes for the Knight..."
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sunny LaCountess" <countessa2000@y.......>
To: <FORKNI-L@l.......>
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: Last Knight (yet another theory)
> It's a great theory, Ell. I like it too. :)
>
> Cheers
> Sunny
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 20:41:00 -0700
From: Sunny LaCountess <countessa2000@y.......>
Subject: Re: twisted end
His answer to me was interesting too. He said:
"I serve no one!"
Considering it was Nick who asked him for the stake in
LK, I'd say LaCroix's answer says it all.
Sunny
--- DPHEIL <dpheil@a.......> wrote:
> I just asked LaCroix if he staked nick in the last
> episode
> http://www.ScreedWasHere.com/ForeverPsychic/
=====
LaCountess -- Twilight Knightie,IB,DT,UF,Cotk
http://www.lacountess.com/FKnight/
"Vampires are make believe, just like elves and gremlins and eskimos!"
--Homer Simpson
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 21:05:55 -0700
From: Emily <emilymhanson@y.......>
Subject: Re: twisted end
His response to me when I asked that was:
"Poor, Smitten Fool. You Are In A Fog, Aren't You?"
I guess that says it all. LOL! But then I asked Nick, and all I got was:
"Sorry." Not much of an answer. <g>
--- DPHEIL <dpheil@a.......> wrote:
> I just asked LaCroix if he staked nick in the last episode
> http://www.ScreedWasHere.com/ForeverPsychic/
=====
Emily M. Hanson
Homepage - http://www.starbase-eprime.us
My Web Graphics - http://www.galaxyofimages.us
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 23:58:39 -0500
From: Kristin <kris1228@e.......>
Subject: Write to get new Knight!
Greetings fans of the Knight,
Ever since Sci-fi returned Forever Knight to their schedule April 1st, it
has boosted this fandom and brought us many new fans (most of which hang out
at the SF BBoard). Everyone wants to see a return movie with the original
cast and FK's main actors are still around and looking great! They could do
it, but the time is now or never. Sci-fi Channel has helped start re-newed
interest in some movies and could, indeed, help convince Sony/Tristar to
release rights for a FK movie(s) of the week. The SciFi channel shows many
original movies made for them and the audience ratings (I think) would
justify the expense.
How are we going to catch their attention you might ask? Firstly, everyone
in the USA needs to show their support and viewing credit to show that
Forever Knight is being devoured by a large audience, even with its poor
time-slot. Just simply leave your cable receiver on in the mornings before
work, if you need to, or like many set a timer on your recorder to catch it.
Secondly, write Tristar and Sci-fi's addresses requesting a return movie
with original cast. Write to both e-mail and snail mail (just as important).
If you don't have time to write, feel free to grab a sample letter off my
"Save the Knight" page. Here's the addresses and yes there are several for
each. Please write as many as you can. Remember, for snail mail all you have
to do is print out extra copies and mail them. The more you can write the
better for our Knight:
Sci-fi Online:
program@w....... and/or feedback@w.......
Tristar/Sony Online:
http://www.sonypictures.com/spe/help_feedback_index.html
Sci-fi's Snail Mail:
Bonnie Hammer
President of Sci-fi Programming
Sci-fi Channel
1230 Avenue Of the Americas
New York, NY 10020
Thomas Vitale
Senior Vice President of Acquisitions,
Scheduling, and Program Planning
The Sci-Fi Channel
1230 Sixth Avenue
New York, NY 10020-1513
Tristar/Sony Snail Mail:
Mel Harris
Chief Operating Officer-Television
Sony Pictures Entertainment
10202 W. Washington Blvd.
Culver City,CA 90232
John Calley, CEO
Ken Lemberger, Co-President
Sony Pictures Entertainment
Tri-Star Bldg.
10102 West Washington Blvd.
Culver City, CA 90232
SPE - Columbia Pictures
550 Madison Avenue
New York City, NY 10022
(212) 833-8500
Sony Pictures Entertainment
150 Roger Avenue
Inwood, NY 11096
(718) 868-5800
Lastly, I have found Sci-fi's phone #, in which you can actually talk to
real people. You will want to speak to the programming department stating
the same basic things, thanking them for Forever Knight's return and of
course the asking of a return movie. Here is the #:
(212)-413-5000
I hope you all will participate in this. Remember, it takes a large fanbase
and hard work to get what we want. The Forever Knight fans must show Sci-fi
and Tristar that we exist, appreciate what they have done, and that we still
would love more of this terrific series. If you are international, please
still e-mail Sci-fi, because if we are granted a return movie, I am sure you
will have a way to see it also. If any of you get decent responses or
important news please e-mail me at: kris1228@e.......
Thanks for your support,
Kristin
http://knightvision.4ever.cc
"When you only have eyes for the Knight..."
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 22:10:51 -0700
From: Jarvinia <jarvinia@g.......>
Subject: Re: twisted end
I got some interesting ones, too.<g>
When I asked LaCroix, he said:
"Oh, don't be such a fool!"
Pretty straight forward, there, I think.
And then I asked Nick, and he said (on the second try...the first time he
was in flashback mode...):
"The Eternal Question..."
Hmm... I tried again and got his answering machine.... Didn't get much of
an answer from Nick.
Jarvinia
jarvinia@g.......
--- DPHEIL <dpheil@a.......> wrote:
> I just asked LaCroix if he staked nick in the last episode
> http://www.ScreedWasHere.com/ForeverPsychic/
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 02:05:19 EDT
From: KnghtWtch@a.......
Subject: Re: Write to get new Knight!
This is partly in answer to the previous post.
As you all know my hubby works for Vivendi/Universal. And I've been trying
to give you guys updates as to what's going on over there since they have
controlling interest in USA/SFC. Well, here's the latest: As it effects
Forever Knight.
Mr. Messier has lost the company over half it's value this past year. He has
been recalled to France two weeks ago, along with half his staff. Mr. Barry
Diller has been rumored to now be the new head of Universal Ent. Co..
Vivendi's American association will end as of Aug 31 of this year. All of
there people will be out of the Seagram's building as of this date. The
building is also going to be sold. After said date Universal Entertainment
Company will be a separate entity with Mr. Diller at it's head.
I don't know who owns the rights to Forever Knight but with Mr. Diller
becoming the media's CEO/COO, I feel he should be added to our list's target
letters. Even though some of you feel he doesn't like FK. Maybe we can
change his mind on the subject with our feedback. I will be forthcoming with
the snail mail address as soon as I have it.
KnightWitch ;-]=
Interestingly...my husband retires Sept 1 so my info will be cut off then.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 02:12:09 -0400
From: Quinn <quinn@g.......>
Subject: Re: GWD in My Fair Lady
Ger was great (well, duh!) in MFL!
Seriously, I hated the play & movie due to too much exposure to it in
school so I didn't expect to enjoy myself completely. The exuberance
of the production - the performances, dancing, staging, costumes &
choreography won me over completely. I can't wait to sit through it
again---something I never thought I would say about MFL!
Want a sneak peak at Ger in a tux? Well, the Stratford Festival
granted us permission to use official production pictures on our web
site so stop by (www.gwdfc.org)!!
--
Quinn
GWDFC officer quinn at gwdfc.org
Official GWD Fan Club site at http://www.gwdfc.org/
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 02:40:55 -0400
From: Marg <mytoronto@r.......>
Subject: Re: GWD in My Fair Lady
Quinn wrote:
> Want a sneak peak at Ger in a tux? Well, the Stratford Festival
> granted us permission to use official production pictures on our web
> site so stop by (www.gwdfc.org)!!
Thanks for posting the pictures, Quinn and thanks too to the Festival
people for allowing you to do so. But there's no substitute for seeing
the man himself in white tie and tails gliding around the ballroom
floor. Fred Astaire, eat your heart out! <g>
Those of you who have tickets to see the show are in for a real treat.
--
Marg <mytoronto@r.......>
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 04:39:39 -0400
From: Cecilia Long <celong@m.......>
Subject: Re: Sci Fi Channel News
Not quite. unless they change main characters, Scott Bakula has said hes not
coming back to do Quantum Leap. HEs too busy with ENterprise.
So maybe we can slip in there instead....
>Subject: Re: Sci Fi Channel News
>So basically, everyone got their wish 'cept for us.
?>:(Well at least they're continuing the reruns
>Sunny
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 01:58:57 -0700
From: Megan Hull <mistrydder@y.......>
Subject: Re: twisted end
I'll bet he was just embarassed for having acted so
stupidly.
-Megan
> And then I asked Nick, and he said (on the second
> try...the first time he was in flashback mode...):
> "The Eternal Question..." Hmm... I tried again and
> got his answering machine.... Didn't get much of
> an answer from Nick.
>
=====
"Eternal nights too short,
How quickly melt away,
With all the love we shared once,
Forever in a Day."
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 17:36:57 +0800
From: Elliza Rahim <relliza@h.......>
Subject: Re: Last Knight (yet another theory)
Thanks ladies. Such mental contortions enable me to survive watching LK on
tape without sinking into Nick-type depression.
>Yes, I could easily accept that one too. :) Great job Ell!
>Kristin
>http://knightvision.4ever.cc
>"When you only have eyes for the Knight..."
> > It's a great theory, Ell. I like it too. :)
> >
> > Cheers
> > Sunny
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 08:41:21 -0400
From: Paula Newman <ravensfyre@c.......>
Subject: Re: GWD in My Fair Lady
Marg wrote:
> Those of you who have tickets to see the show are in for a real treat.
By this time next week I'll be on my way up to Stratford to see the show.
Is anyone else going to be there between the 23rd and 25th?
Paula
"There is no great achievement that is not the result of patient working and
waiting." -Josiah Holland
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:06:07 -0400
From: Debbie Clarke <dittany121@h.......>
Subject: Re: Last Knight (yet another theory)
Works for me as well Ell. Your theory would fit with LaCroix's
personality.
Debbie
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 08:24:41 -0700
From: Victor Roscetti <dragonslair_08060@y.......>
Subject: Re: Write to get new Knight!
Also everyone should pester these guys at Sony for DVD
season Box sets of Forever Knight! I did!
They're big releases right now are the Jeffersons
and Sanford and Son!
Vic Roscetti
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:42:19 -0500
From: Kristin <kris1228@e.......>
Subject: Re: Write to get new Knight!
Yes, please do continue the pursuit for DVDs. Addresses for everything can
be found on my "Save the Knight" page.
Kristin
http://knightvision.4ever.cc
"When you only have eyes for the Knight..."
> Also everyone should pester these guys at Sony for DVD
> season Box sets of Forever Knight! I did!
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 12:02:47 -0700
From: Beverly Collins-LaCroix <beverlylacroix@w.......>
Subject: Last Knight
<<Gods,I have never seen this episode before so I didn't realize how
throughly depressing it was. Even Ashes to Ashes isn't this depressing.
I hope that Nicholas and LaCroix do live on. For some reason, this
reminds me of a Shakesperian tragdy, paticulart Othello, but than
again,I am rambiling.
Peaches,Cousin Bree >>
Thoroughly depressing, and it just stays with you for days. And I agree
it was put together extremely well. It was just very depressing.
Tracy's death was so sad. But one thing, she told Nick he could have
trusted her, but she didn't trust him enough to tell him about Vachon.
That might have changed things somewhat. Who knows? It was just an
emotional experience.
Beverly
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 13:04:02 -0700
From: Kelly C Smith <tigrlady2u@j.......>
Subject: Re: Last Knight (yet another theory)
My theory:
LK was a nightmare of one of the following:
A. Natalie (my personal
belief!). As a result of Lara Haynes' suicide.
B. Nick. As an after effect of
Divia's attack, or, from a glass of bad cow.
C. LaCroix. Again, an after
effect of Divia's attack, but with a sudden guilt for how he's treated
Nick all these years. Nick did, after all, save him from Divia when he
could have let her kill him.
LK had to be a nightmare or hallucination. After all, nobody dies.
Nobody *ever* dies. :-)
Just my thoughts.
KC Smith
tigrlady2u@j.......
Nick/Natpacker with Dark tendencies.
"I've never met a chocolate I didn't like."
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 13:22:15 -0700
From: Viv <viv11374@y.......>
Subject: Re: Last Knight (yet another theory)
--- Kelly C Smith <tigrlady2u@j.......> wrote:
>
>
> LK had to be a nightmare or hallucination. After all, nobody
> dies.
> Nobody *ever* dies. :-)
So glad to hear it, especially after six years of my brother
trying to convince me that *everybody* dies, including Janette in
Human Factor. He's convinced that the only two charactors to
survive Last Knight were Reese and LaCroix.
=====
Viv
Don't annoy the crazy person
Life's a witch and then you fly
------------------------------
End of FORKNI-L Digest - 15 Jul 2002 to 16 Jul 2002 - Special issue (#2002-209)
*******************************************************************************
Parchment background created by Melissa Snell and may be found at http://historymedren.about.com/
